![]() |
Cameras Located Within Agency and Provider Incall Spaces - Printable Version +- Menz.Life - Escort Listings & Reviews (https://menz.life/forum) +-- Forum: Menz.Life (https://menz.life/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Trust & Safety Alerts (https://menz.life/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=35) +--- Thread: Cameras Located Within Agency and Provider Incall Spaces (/showthread.php?tid=452) |
RE: Cameras Located Within Agency and Provider Incall Spaces - TB12 - 06-18-2025 Hello, I can also mention that I have seen cameras at Bunz Club, Skyline, and Asian Fever. I also have seen one at Nicole Vixen's incall location, placed on the counter immediately upon entering, and another time outside her unit's door. Also Emily Woods had one, but I think she is retired. Im not sure if my word holds any weight here, but thats what i have seen. Thx RE: Cameras Located Within Agency and Provider Incall Spaces - razzar1234 - 06-18-2025 (06-18-2025, 06:55 AM)adastr@ Wrote: Has it been confirmed that Nicole Vixon records inside her incall? have seen it myself, and it was mentioned on perb. unlike other providers this one wasnt exactly hidden. RE: Cameras Located Within Agency and Provider Incall Spaces - MB_ - 06-18-2025 (06-18-2025, 06:55 AM)adastr@ Wrote:I have seen one at Nicole Vixens too.(06-17-2025, 07:21 PM)Silverfox Wrote: Personally, I would appreciate hearing an explanation from Nicole Vixen, as I noticed she now has an account here. The times I saw her, I don't recall ever noticing a camera, but I suppose that might be a sign of how captivated I was by her looks. And for the record, she’s one of the most popular and best providers in the city. Probably top 3 favourites I have seen, and all for a reasonable pricepoint. We’re not trying to harm her business, I'm sure most guys would be happy to see her again. Our main concern is that she stops recording clients, as it compromises our privacy. RE: Cameras Located Within Agency and Provider Incall Spaces - adastr@ - 06-18-2025 (06-12-2025, 12:17 PM)SuperJ Wrote: (I edited your list SuperJ, we will use razzar1234's lists. - adastra) RE: Cameras Located Within Agency and Provider Incall Spaces - okfallsdude - 06-18-2025 the Brielle chick in maple ridge/mission area records everything someone posted it on perb RE: Cameras Located Within Agency and Provider Incall Spaces - Plato - 06-18-2025 Natalie Bijoux in the massage section had a camera attached to the outside of her door at her west end location. She works sporadically. RE: Cameras Located Within Agency and Provider Incall Spaces - Boomba - 06-19-2025 (06-18-2025, 05:56 PM)Plato Wrote: Natalie Bijoux in the massage section had a camera attached to the outside of her door at her west end location. She works sporadically.I can confirm this as well, although it was a few years ago I saw her. RE: Cameras Located Within Agency and Provider Incall Spaces - princeofpersia - 06-19-2025 Skyline record my weiner RE: Cameras Located Within Agency and Provider Incall Spaces - Marko - 06-19-2025 (06-18-2025, 08:23 AM)yaletownfuckboi Wrote: What exactly do you expect us to do? Do you want us to visit these incalls and take pictures or videos of the cameras so we can verify it for you? Essentially, are you asking us to dox ourselves just to prove it? If you are legit user than I trust you. Such as Maverick/Gentlemen. If its not a regular user that is known then we shouldn't trust them. (06-18-2025, 08:23 AM)yaletownfuckboi Wrote: Additionally, none of the providers or agencies mentioned have come forward here to deny having cameras inside their incalls. That says a lot, t’s practically an admission of guilt. Humm, I wouldn't presume that. There are many reasons why someone would not post or sign up. Many SPs say that Menz is a website that they will never support by signing up or any association at all. (06-18-2025, 08:23 AM)yaletownfuckboi Wrote: And if you think about it logically, what would any of us gain from lying about there being cameras inside the incalls? How would that benefit anyone? Some escorts get haters, that hate on them for the sake of it. So they make up lies. So that is why reviews need to be members that we know. (06-18-2025, 08:23 AM)yaletownfuckboi Wrote: I'm actually surprised that so many providers have an issue with this site, because your moderation style consistently places the burden of proof on men, never on women. A woman's testimony is given more weight than the testimony of ten men in your moderation approach. I will try to improve, I made many mistakes here so far. RE: Cameras Located Within Agency and Provider Incall Spaces - MissHunter - 06-19-2025 (06-19-2025, 03:18 PM)princeofpersia Wrote: Skyline record my weiner I’m trying to keep my responses general here on all this shit, But I highly doubt they want to record your wiener lol Maybe if it’s a special request and you pay them extra for it? RE: Cameras Located Within Agency and Provider Incall Spaces - MissHunter - 06-19-2025 Shit I just realized I jumped back into a thread I was told to no longer respond on But did I make you guys laugh at least? Hopefully at least a few of you have a sense of humour … I’ll pack up my crack pipes & get off this thread now… RE: Cameras Located Within Agency and Provider Incall Spaces - Boomba - 06-20-2025 Hey everyone, I just wanted to share that my ex girlfriend is a reputable and well known provider. I reached out to her to get her opinion on this issue. She believes it’s wrong to have cameras inside incalls without informing clients beforehand. She’s actually quite upset about it because she feels it violates clients consent and also is a bad look for girls in the industry as a whole who don’t engage in such practices. I just wanted to share this to let you all know that not all escorts support this, there are many who strongly oppose the use of cameras inside incalls. I asked her if she would be willing to sign up here to publicly share her stance, but she declined because she wants to avoid getting involved in any drama. RE: Cameras Located Within Agency and Provider Incall Spaces - Boomba - 06-20-2025 (06-20-2025, 03:00 PM)MissHunter Wrote:It's upsetting because it breaches the trust and privacy between providers and clients. Also, it violates the clients consent. It also reflects poorly on other providers and causes clients overall to hesitate when booking with ladies, as they cannot determine which ones have incall cameras, since this information is never disclosed to clients prior. It also is a sexist double standard,(06-20-2025, 10:03 AM)Boomba Wrote: Hey everyone, I just wanted to share that my ex girlfriend is a reputable and well known provider. I reached out to her to get her opinion on this issue. She believes it’s wrong to have cameras inside incalls without informing clients beforehand. She’s actually quite upset about it because she feels it violates clients consent and also is a bad look for girls in the industry as a whole who don’t engage in such practices.Why is it so upsetting? It's quite different when it comes to a parlour or brothel, as these are public facing businesses. Moreover, the cameras are almost always positioned at the front door well away from the areas where intimacy occurs in separate rooms. Additionally, many clients avoid parlours and brothels for this very reason. RE: Cameras Located Within Agency and Provider Incall Spaces - aceee - 06-20-2025 (06-20-2025, 03:16 PM)Boomba Wrote: It's quite different when it comes to a parlour or brothel, as these are public facing businesses. Moreover, the cameras are almost always positioned at the front door well away from the areas where intimacy occurs in separate rooms. Additionally, many clients avoid parlours and brothels for this very reason.I’d add that brothels and parlous usually allow you to enter wearing a hood, COVID mask, and baseball cap, which offers a lot more anonymity. RE: Cameras Located Within Agency and Provider Incall Spaces - MissHunter - 06-20-2025 Like lotlizard mentioned on another thread I also miss the old days. Yeah there was risk involved but nothing like the current times where both sides are so suspicious & at war either each other RE: Cameras Located Within Agency and Provider Incall Spaces - Silverfox - 06-20-2025 (06-20-2025, 03:16 PM)MissHunter Wrote: As providers in the current time we have to handle so much sensitive info already plus crazy risk with the economy taking a nose dive so we are targets for robberyEveryone has explained why it upsets us and why its wrong, ad nauseam. They are not legal, no matter how much you claim they are, it doesn't change the fact that they aren't. It's not just a few people upset or having issues with this, it's a large number of individuals, the large majority of clients who are concerned about it. You still haven't provided a valid reason for why it shouldn't be advertised. Your bosses, along with the other agencies and women involved, have remained silent on the issue, which means they know it’s wrong and illegal. You still haven't provided us with a statement from your lawyer, which probably means he either backed out because he knows it's illegal or he doesn't exist. RE: Cameras Located Within Agency and Provider Incall Spaces - not_a_drugdealer - 06-20-2025 (06-20-2025, 04:23 PM)MissHunter Wrote: And why is it so hard for everyone here to understand “reasonable expectation of privacy”Because when someone is having sex or is unclothed, there is a reasonable expectation of privacy. Why is that so difficult for you to understand? RE: Cameras Located Within Agency and Provider Incall Spaces - MissHunter - 06-20-2025 (06-20-2025, 07:19 PM)not_a_drugdealer Wrote:(06-20-2025, 04:23 PM)MissHunter Wrote: And why is it so hard for everyone here to understand “reasonable expectation of privacy”Because when someone is having sex or is unclothed, there is a reasonable expectation of privacy. Why is that so difficult for you to understand? I never said filming people having sex or naked without consent is ok RE: Cameras Located Within Agency and Provider Incall Spaces - Silverfox - 06-20-2025 (06-20-2025, 04:23 PM)MissHunter Wrote: Not legal? Sorry bro but a good friend who is a very experienced lawyer read through all my postsSince he is a "reputable lawyer" receiving payment to represent a client, there is no issue with him issuing an official statement on his law firm's stationery and letterhead. This has nothing to do with him being a "pooner,", he can deny that and merely say he is representing a client. Doing so would enhance both his credibility and yours, as his current portrayal makes him seem like the worst lawyer in Canada. |