Rina Mood DNR?

[yaletownfuckboi]

Noticed both Rina Mood threads have been moved to the private forum.
Seem like censorship to anyone else? 
Does Menz.life now have a DNR list? or a DNR negatively list?
Come on Adastra

[adastra]

Noticed both Rina Mood threads have been moved to the private forum.
Seem like censorship to anyone else? 
Does Menz.life now have a DNR list? or a DNR negatively list?
Come on Adastra

The originally review was negative but perfectly fine, but then the other comments derailed it. Started to name call, call her old, ugly, looks like a man, etc. You can leave a bad review but you have to be civil.

Yes you can be yourself, but no you cannot be rude, in private you can be rude. We need to maintain a level of respect for the public forum.  I will move it back editing out the insults.

And we never claim to be free of censorship, that's not possible because people troll for the sake of trolling, post advertisements, etc, but we claim to be transparent and reasonable people.

[KimChiHoles]

Noticed both Rina Mood threads have been moved to the private forum.
Seem like censorship to anyone else? 
Does Menz.life now have a DNR list? or a DNR negatively list?
Come on Adastra

The originally review was negative but perfectly fine, but then the other comments derailed it. Started to name call, call her old, ugly, looks like a man, etc. You can leave a bad review but you have to be civil.

Yes you can be yourself, but no you cannot be rude, in private you can be rude. We need to maintain a level of respect for the public forum.  I will move it back editing out the insults.

And we never claim to be free of censorship, that's not possible because people troll for the sake of trolling, post advertisements, etc, but we claim to be transparent and reasonable people.

That all sounds perfectly reasonable to me .

[yaletownfuckboi]

Noticed both Rina Mood threads have been moved to the private forum.
Seem like censorship to anyone else? 
Does Menz.life now have a DNR list? or a DNR negatively list?
Come on Adastra

The originally review was negative but perfectly fine, but then the other comments derailed it. Started to name call, call her old, ugly, looks like a man, etc. You can leave a bad review but you have to be civil.
Yes you can be yourself, but no you cannot be rude, in private you can be rude. We need to maintain a level of respect for the public forum.  I will move it back editing out the insults.
And we never claim to be free of censorship, that's not possible because people troll for the sake of trolling, post advertisements, etc, but we claim to be transparent and reasonable people.

I think that if the discussion devolves into calling a provider "ugly," some moderation can be warranted. In such cases, it might be better to lock the thread and keep it public rather than delete it, rather than to move it to a private forum, without an explanation provided. I believe it's entirely reasonable for men who aren't part of the private forum, as well as visitors to the site, to have access to threads containing negative reviews. After all, reviews serve to protect clients. Thats just my opinion.
Now, if any guy sees her and wants to write a review, he may hesitate to do so, worried that his effort will go to waste if the review ends up being removed.

I haven't met Rina personally, but I've seen pictures and videos of her face, and I believe the celebrity comparison is both fair and quite accurate. Not all celebrity comparisons need to be of the same gender. Additionally, I think it's reasonable to question someone's age, especially in an industry where a significant percentage of providers misrepresent their age.

[adastra]

I haven't met Rina personally, but I've seen pictures and videos of her face, and I believe the celebrity comparison is both fair and quite accurate. Not all celebrity comparisons need to be of the same gender. Additionally, I think it's reasonable to question someone's age, especially in an industry where a significant percentage of providers misrepresent their age.

Yes I agree as long as you post in a respectful way. For example if you call her a rat-face, that gets deleted. Whereas, if you say, I didn't find her attractive, or she isn't not my cup of tea, that's totally fine. As long as you remain civil there is no problems. If you start being rude that ruins it for everyone. So I am happy you agree about this.

Again - we now have users who sign up, simply to troll. And users who sign up, simply to advertise their crypto scams. So this gets worse as the site get more traffic.

---

Now, if any guy sees her and wants to write a review, he may hesitate to do so, worried that his effort will go to waste if the review ends up being removed.

This touches upon one thing I really loath about Perb. That they allow users to delete threads. We don't allow that here, You can only delete your own personal posts, not threads. This ends up being a colossal waste of time for other users. Sometimes users will put hundreds of hours into responses into a thread - only for the thread to get deleted by the original poster. This would happen all the time on Perb and made me not want to participate and waste my time there.

[Ronnieradke]

Everyone has different standards in terms of facial looks - I see a lot of girls guys say are above a 7 facially and to me they are a 4.
Keeping it civil is my go to. It shows some of those guys have not had any real life action but everyone has different standards

[yaletownfuckboi]

Everyone has different standards in terms of facial looks - I see a lot of girls guys say are above a 7 facially and to me they are a 4.
Keeping it civil is my go to. It shows some of those guys have not had any real life action but everyone has different standards

Yeah, I mean, alooks aren't as subjective as many guys on these forums like to claim.

But I do think that most of the guys who rate every escort's looks excessively high probably aren't interacting or having sex with many, if any, civilian women for free.

[Mrtea]

Looks are always subjective which is why I don’t do or see rating scales on looks to be accurate. Calling someone ugly or names is just rude and not called for. Personally if I found a SP not attractive I would say something like they are not my taste of women.

[yaletownfuckboi]

Looks are always subjective which is why I don’t do or see rating scales on looks to be accurate. Calling someone ugly or names is just rude and not called for. Personally if I found a SP not attractive I would say something like they are not my taste of women.

no one called her ugly.

[marcus.glizzy]

Looks are always subjective which is why I don’t do or see rating scales on looks to be accurate. Calling someone ugly or names is just rude and not called for. Personally if I found a SP not attractive I would say something like they are not my taste of women.

You called me ugly