Vetting clients with government ID is unreliable and potentially dangerous. A photo ID reveals very little about a person’s true character. A more effective approach might be to rely on a network-based reputation system, where trust is built through verified interactions, endorsements, and community feedback. Instead of static identity checks, providers can make informed decisions by referencing reviews, connections, and status within the network. Agencies, reputable sources, or experienced members can vouch for individuals, creating a hierarchy of trust that evolves organically. This system prioritizes real-world credibility over a fragile piece of plastic, fostering a safer and more transparent environment.
The practice on Tryst of providers demanding government IDs from clients is problematic for several reasons. While requiring a LinkedIn profile may seem more reasonable, since it’s already public, it comes with its own privacy concerns, as LinkedIn has a poor track record of protecting user data. Furthermore, LinkedIn is heavily geared toward business and tech industries, meaning many clients may not use it regularly or may be reluctant to link their professional identity to their personal interactions. A more effective approach might be to establish trust through a vetted network, where reputation and community validation carry more weight than easily forged or privacy-invasive credentials.
Here are some reasons to consider why you should not share your ID (or ask for ID):
1 - Privacy Risks: Providing a digital copy of your ID can potentially expose you to identity theft or fraud if the provider mishandles or stores your information insecurely.
2 - Data Security: Not all providers have robust security measures in place to protect the sensitive information you provide.
3 - Legal Consequences for Clients: Some aspects of sex work are decriminalized in Canada, however, there are still severe legal risks associated with participating in or facilitating certain activities related to prostitution. Sharing your ID could potentially implicate you in legal matters if authorities were to investigate.
4 - Transparency and Trust: Providers are often not transparent about why they need your ID, how they will use it, or how they will protect your information.
5 - Stigma and Reputation: If your personal information is mishandled or leaked, it could lead to social stigma, embarrassment, or damage to your reputation if it becomes public knowledge.
6 - Financial Risks: There's a risk that your financial information or details could be exposed if your ID is shared inappropriately.
7 - Blackmail or Extortion: There is a risk that individuals or organizations could use your personal information to blackmail or extort you for financial gain or other purposes.
8 - Stalking: When you give out your name and address, if the provider is not reliable, there is a risk the provider could stalk you.
9 - Home Address Security: IDs contain your home address. If the provider or their contacts are not reliable, your home could be at risk of theft or other criminal activities. As well as uninvited visits or persistent contact.
10 - Employment or Legal Implications: Depending on your profession or personal circumstances, having your association with escorts or sex work exposed could have implications for your current or future employment, relationships, or legal matters.
11 - Legal action against the provider: If the provider fails to comply with PIPEDA standards (Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act), resulting in a privacy breach, the provider may be held accountable and subject to legal action.
12 - Psychological Pressure: Providers requesting IDs may exert psychological pressure, making individuals feel compelled to comply despite the high privacy risks.
Here are some reasons to consider why you should never use LinkedIn:
LinkedIn has a history of privacy breaches and faced several incidents and controversies related to privacy. Here are some notable instances:
1 - 2012 Password Breach: In June 2012, LinkedIn experienced a major data breach where hackers stole approximately 6.5 million encrypted passwords from the site. This incident underscored vulnerabilities in LinkedIn's security measures.
2 - 2016 Data Breach: In May 2016, a hacker was attempting to sell account information, including emails and passwords, belonging to 117 million LinkedIn users. This breach was traced back to the 2012 incident, indicating that the stolen data was more extensive than initially reported.
3 - 2017 LinkedIn AutoFill Plugin Flaw: In April 2017, a security researcher discovered a vulnerability in LinkedIn's AutoFill plugin for browsers. This flaw allowed malicious websites to harvest users' personal information, including their LinkedIn profile data, without their consent.
4 - LinkedIn iOS App Privacy Issue: In July 2021, it was reported that LinkedIn's iOS app was copying and pasting contents from users' clipboards on their devices. This raised concerns about privacy violations as the app was accessing data without users' knowledge or consent.
5 - Data Scraping Incidents: LinkedIn has faced multiple instances of data scraping where third-party companies or individuals scrape large amounts of user data from the platform for various purposes, potentially compromising user privacy.
Privacy-conscious individuals often steer clear of LinkedIn and similar websites due to ongoing concerns about data security and personal information exposure. Given LinkedIn's history of privacy breaches and incidents involving compromised user data, these individuals opt for more secure professional networking platforms or communication methods. By making deliberate choices about their online presence, they prioritize safeguarding their personal information and maintaining greater control over their digital footprint.
In Conclusion:
Trust and privacy should be mutual in any professional exchange. Clients respect providers’ anonymity by accepting blurred photos, aliases, and non-verified ages, yet they often receive little transparency in return. A more balanced approach—one built on honesty, accountability, and a reputation-based system—creates a safer and more respectful environment for everyone. Menz is committed to fostering professionalism and fairness, where trust is earned through real interactions. By prioritizing integrity and reciprocity, we can help set a higher standard for the industry—one that benefits both providers and clients alike.
last updated: Feb 14, 2025
The practice on Tryst of providers demanding government IDs from clients is problematic for several reasons. While requiring a LinkedIn profile may seem more reasonable, since it’s already public, it comes with its own privacy concerns, as LinkedIn has a poor track record of protecting user data. Furthermore, LinkedIn is heavily geared toward business and tech industries, meaning many clients may not use it regularly or may be reluctant to link their professional identity to their personal interactions. A more effective approach might be to establish trust through a vetted network, where reputation and community validation carry more weight than easily forged or privacy-invasive credentials.
Here are some reasons to consider why you should not share your ID (or ask for ID):
1 - Privacy Risks: Providing a digital copy of your ID can potentially expose you to identity theft or fraud if the provider mishandles or stores your information insecurely.
2 - Data Security: Not all providers have robust security measures in place to protect the sensitive information you provide.
3 - Legal Consequences for Clients: Some aspects of sex work are decriminalized in Canada, however, there are still severe legal risks associated with participating in or facilitating certain activities related to prostitution. Sharing your ID could potentially implicate you in legal matters if authorities were to investigate.
4 - Transparency and Trust: Providers are often not transparent about why they need your ID, how they will use it, or how they will protect your information.
5 - Stigma and Reputation: If your personal information is mishandled or leaked, it could lead to social stigma, embarrassment, or damage to your reputation if it becomes public knowledge.
6 - Financial Risks: There's a risk that your financial information or details could be exposed if your ID is shared inappropriately.
7 - Blackmail or Extortion: There is a risk that individuals or organizations could use your personal information to blackmail or extort you for financial gain or other purposes.
8 - Stalking: When you give out your name and address, if the provider is not reliable, there is a risk the provider could stalk you.
9 - Home Address Security: IDs contain your home address. If the provider or their contacts are not reliable, your home could be at risk of theft or other criminal activities. As well as uninvited visits or persistent contact.
10 - Employment or Legal Implications: Depending on your profession or personal circumstances, having your association with escorts or sex work exposed could have implications for your current or future employment, relationships, or legal matters.
11 - Legal action against the provider: If the provider fails to comply with PIPEDA standards (Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act), resulting in a privacy breach, the provider may be held accountable and subject to legal action.
12 - Psychological Pressure: Providers requesting IDs may exert psychological pressure, making individuals feel compelled to comply despite the high privacy risks.
Here are some reasons to consider why you should never use LinkedIn:
LinkedIn has a history of privacy breaches and faced several incidents and controversies related to privacy. Here are some notable instances:
1 - 2012 Password Breach: In June 2012, LinkedIn experienced a major data breach where hackers stole approximately 6.5 million encrypted passwords from the site. This incident underscored vulnerabilities in LinkedIn's security measures.
2 - 2016 Data Breach: In May 2016, a hacker was attempting to sell account information, including emails and passwords, belonging to 117 million LinkedIn users. This breach was traced back to the 2012 incident, indicating that the stolen data was more extensive than initially reported.
3 - 2017 LinkedIn AutoFill Plugin Flaw: In April 2017, a security researcher discovered a vulnerability in LinkedIn's AutoFill plugin for browsers. This flaw allowed malicious websites to harvest users' personal information, including their LinkedIn profile data, without their consent.
4 - LinkedIn iOS App Privacy Issue: In July 2021, it was reported that LinkedIn's iOS app was copying and pasting contents from users' clipboards on their devices. This raised concerns about privacy violations as the app was accessing data without users' knowledge or consent.
5 - Data Scraping Incidents: LinkedIn has faced multiple instances of data scraping where third-party companies or individuals scrape large amounts of user data from the platform for various purposes, potentially compromising user privacy.
Privacy-conscious individuals often steer clear of LinkedIn and similar websites due to ongoing concerns about data security and personal information exposure. Given LinkedIn's history of privacy breaches and incidents involving compromised user data, these individuals opt for more secure professional networking platforms or communication methods. By making deliberate choices about their online presence, they prioritize safeguarding their personal information and maintaining greater control over their digital footprint.
In Conclusion:
Trust and privacy should be mutual in any professional exchange. Clients respect providers’ anonymity by accepting blurred photos, aliases, and non-verified ages, yet they often receive little transparency in return. A more balanced approach—one built on honesty, accountability, and a reputation-based system—creates a safer and more respectful environment for everyone. Menz is committed to fostering professionalism and fairness, where trust is earned through real interactions. By prioritizing integrity and reciprocity, we can help set a higher standard for the industry—one that benefits both providers and clients alike.
last updated: Feb 14, 2025
![[Image: logo.png]](https://menz.life/forum/images/logo.png){kind=logo}
Menz.Life is not-for-profit