Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Serena Sinclair - A collection of negative reviews
#1
Wowza, this girl has quite a few negative reviews. I've compiled a selection of them below, including screenshots and text versions that I've copied and pasted. Please note that these reviews are not mine.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Serena Sinclair:
Serena proved to be effortlessly approachable with prompt responses. Our meeting took place at her charming upscale incall in Gastown, albeit with the usual challenge of finding parking in the area. The incall itself was impeccably clean, well-equipped with all necessary amenities, and more. Upon meeting Serena, our connection was immediate – she exuded a friendly demeanor, always smiling and engaging in easy conversation. It's evident that she takes pleasure in her work and possesses the skill to keep conversations flowing. While undeniably attractive with a girl-next-door charm, I suspect she may be slightly older than her listed age, though not by a significant margin.
Serena's physique, though appealing, didn't quite align with the images featured on her advertisement and website. It seems those visuals may be somewhat outdated, lately I have seen her share more recent photos and videos on X, which I find to be a more accurate representation. Despite the variance, Serena's body is still impressive, even if it doesn't match the tight perfection portrayed in her ad and website.
Throughout our entire session, I felt at ease, thanks to Serena's ability to create an environment where it felt like we had known each other for a long time, despite it being our first encounter. Overall, the experience was delightful. As for a repeat visit, I'm uncertain, considering the rates; there might be better options available. Nonetheless, I do recommend her services.
Face: 7 , Body: 7, Service: 6, Attitude: 7.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Serena Sinclair:
To be honest, I had my reservations about writing this review, because I must say Serena really does strike me as a genuinely pleasant girl, but I feel like I wouldn't be doing justice to those considering booking with her if I were to write a sugarcoated review that isn't completely honest, because I was somewhat let down by our interaction. So here it is:

The positives:
Like I said earlier, Serena is a really cool and nice girl. She's very chill and easy to talk to and I think she genuinely enjoys meeting new people and having a good chat. It's obvious that the social aspect of her job is something she genuinely loves. She has a pretty face and a cute smile.

The disappointments:
-Honestly, I hate to say it, and I say it in the nicest way possible, but her body doesn't match up with the photos on her website and ad. And since that's one of the main reasons I booked with her, it's a major disappointment. Don't get me wrong, her body is nice but I'd say it's more of an average body for a girl her age. In her pics on her ad and website, her body appears to be almost flawless, sporting a seriously tight and curvy bubble butt booty, an incredible hip to waist ratio, and perfectly toned in all the right spots It's like one of those bodies you'd see on a fitness model's Instagram.On the flip side, in real life, her body is just kind of average. It's pretty obvious that she doesn't hit the gym, and it definitely doesn't come close to matching those pictures. I hate to sound harsh, but honesty is necessary here. If I had known the truth before booking with her, I definitely wouldn't have gone through with it.
-Although she's undeniably attractive facially , I wasn't exactly blown away by her face or anything. When she opened the door and I finally saw it, I can't deny feeling a bit disappointed in my head. I guess you never really know what to expect facially, but considering the premium, I was expecting a bit more.I also think that she might be a few years older than her advertised age, maybe by about five years or so.
-Like I mentioned before, I think Serena really loves the part of her gig where she gets to chat and connect with new folks. But it kinda felt like she was trying to stretch that out as much as possible. I mean, don't get me wrong, its nice to have some banter and chemistry before getting down to business, but when it goes on for too long and feels forced, it's a bummer because there's another reason why I'm there.
-Moving on to the sex part, I gotta say, it was kinda underwhelming. From the fake moans that kicked in before anything even happened, the awkward position changes, and just the overall lack of flow compared to what I have experienced with most other providers, it was a bit underwhelming, to be honest.

It's important to keep in mind that every individual experiences may differ when considering any review (ymmv) . I acknowledge that people have varying reason for participating in this hobby, and if you prioritize conversation and companionship over looks or sex appeal, she might be a good choice for you. Regarding the quality of service, it could have been an exception and she might have had an off day. I kindly request you to avoid adding negative or disrespectful comments. I tried to to write this review in an honest manner, so I apologize if it sounds too critical or harsh. Once again, she is a pleasant girl, and I kindly ask you to treat her well and with respect.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Serena Sinclair 9441:

Serena's communication was excellent. Her downtown incall was beautiful, albeit a bit cozy. She's an engaging conversationalist, and we shared some delightful conversations.

When it comes to appearance, Serena is undeniably stunning, and her photos are an accurate representation of her.

Regarding value, I've experienced other providers at her price point who left me completely astounded. While Serena is undeniably lovely and kind, I felt that the connection during our intimate moments was a bit lacking, leaving something to be desired.
Engagement (Communication): 10/10
Setting (Incall): 9/10
Cost-effectiveness (Value): 5/10
Outward Appeal (Looks): 9/10
Romance: 5/10
Total Experience (Overall Performance): 7.6/10
Overall, Serena is a wonderful provider with a warm and kind personality, and I'm sure many others will enjoy their time with her.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Hey crodie, I have only seen Serena Sinclair.

Age: 30s, it's kinda tough to figure out how old she is, though, her face is pretty heavily filled with injectables, so her age is hard to pin down!

Celebrity comparison wise, on TERB someone compared her to Khloe Kardashian, and when I read that, I'm like 'yep, totally see the resemblance!' She's got a similar face shape and features, for sure.
If you don't really keep up with the Kardashians, Khloe Kardashian is known for editing her pics a ton. So when you compare Serena to her, she's like Khloe without the Photoshop (check out the pic on the right below).

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

   
               

(11-19-2024, 03:26 PM)MB_ Wrote: Wowza, this girl has quite a few negative reviews. I've compiled a selection of them below, including screenshots and text versions that I've copied and pasted. Please note that these reviews are not mine.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Serena Sinclair:
Serena proved to be effortlessly approachable with prompt responses. Our meeting took place at her charming upscale incall in Gastown, albeit with the usual challenge of finding parking in the area. The incall itself was impeccably clean, well-equipped with all necessary amenities, and more. Upon meeting Serena, our connection was immediate – she exuded a friendly demeanor, always smiling and engaging in easy conversation. It's evident that she takes pleasure in her work and possesses the skill to keep conversations flowing. While undeniably attractive with a girl-next-door charm, I suspect she may be slightly older than her listed age, though not by a significant margin.
Serena's physique, though appealing, didn't quite align with the images featured on her advertisement and website. It seems those visuals may be somewhat outdated, lately I have seen her share more recent photos and videos on X, which I find to be a more accurate representation. Despite the variance, Serena's body is still impressive, even if it doesn't match the tight perfection portrayed in her ad and website.
Throughout our entire session, I felt at ease, thanks to Serena's ability to create an environment where it felt like we had known each other for a long time, despite it being our first encounter. Overall, the experience was delightful. As for a repeat visit, I'm uncertain, considering the rates; there might be better options available. Nonetheless, I do recommend her services.
Face: 7 , Body: 7, Service: 6, Attitude: 7.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Serena Sinclair:
To be honest, I had my reservations about writing this review, because I must say Serena really does strike me as a genuinely pleasant girl, but I feel like I wouldn't be doing justice to those considering booking with her if I were to write a sugarcoated review that isn't completely honest, because I was somewhat let down by our interaction. So here it is:

The positives:
Like I said earlier, Serena is a really cool and nice girl. She's very chill and easy to talk to and I think she genuinely enjoys meeting new people and having a good chat. It's obvious that the social aspect of her job is something she genuinely loves. She has a pretty face and a cute smile.

The disappointments:
-Honestly, I hate to say it, and I say it in the nicest way possible, but her body doesn't match up with the photos on her website and ad. And since that's one of the main reasons I booked with her, it's a major disappointment. Don't get me wrong, her body is nice but I'd say it's more of an average body for a girl her age. In her pics on her ad and website, her body appears to be almost flawless, sporting a seriously tight and curvy bubble butt booty, an incredible hip to waist ratio, and perfectly toned in all the right spots It's like one of those bodies you'd see on a fitness model's Instagram.On the flip side, in real life, her body is just kind of average. It's pretty obvious that she doesn't hit the gym, and it definitely doesn't come close to matching those pictures. I hate to sound harsh, but honesty is necessary here. If I had known the truth before booking with her, I definitely wouldn't have gone through with it.
-Although she's undeniably attractive facially , I wasn't exactly blown away by her face or anything. When she opened the door and I finally saw it, I can't deny feeling a bit disappointed in my head. I guess you never really know what to expect facially, but considering the premium, I was expecting a bit more.I also think that she might be a few years older than her advertised age, maybe by about five years or so.
-Like I mentioned before, I think Serena really loves the part of her gig where she gets to chat and connect with new folks. But it kinda felt like she was trying to stretch that out as much as possible. I mean, don't get me wrong, its nice to have some banter and chemistry before getting down to business, but when it goes on for too long and feels forced, it's a bummer because there's another reason why I'm there.
-Moving on to the sex part, I gotta say, it was kinda underwhelming. From the fake moans that kicked in before anything even happened, the awkward position changes, and just the overall lack of flow compared to what I have experienced with most other providers, it was a bit underwhelming, to be honest.

It's important to keep in mind that every individual experiences may differ when considering any review (ymmv) . I acknowledge that people have varying reason for participating in this hobby, and if you prioritize conversation and companionship over looks or sex appeal, she might be a good choice for you. Regarding the quality of service, it could have been an exception and she might have had an off day. I kindly request you to avoid adding negative or disrespectful comments. I tried to to write this review in an honest manner, so I apologize if it sounds too critical or harsh. Once again, she is a pleasant girl, and I kindly ask you to treat her well and with respect.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Serena Sinclair 9441:

Serena's communication was excellent. Her downtown incall was beautiful, albeit a bit cozy. She's an engaging conversationalist, and we shared some delightful conversations.

When it comes to appearance, Serena is undeniably stunning, and her photos are an accurate representation of her.

Regarding value, I've experienced other providers at her price point who left me completely astounded. While Serena is undeniably lovely and kind, I felt that the connection during our intimate moments was a bit lacking, leaving something to be desired.
Engagement (Communication): 10/10
Setting (Incall): 9/10
Cost-effectiveness (Value): 5/10
Outward Appeal (Looks): 9/10
Romance: 5/10
Total Experience (Overall Performance): 7.6/10
Overall, Serena is a wonderful provider with a warm and kind personality, and I'm sure many others will enjoy their time with her.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Hey crodie, I have only seen Serena Sinclair.

Age: 30s, it's kinda tough to figure out how old she is, though, her face is pretty heavily filled with injectables, so her age is hard to pin down!

Celebrity comparison wise, on TERB someone compared her to Khloe Kardashian, and when I read that, I'm like 'yep, totally see the resemblance!' She's got a similar face shape and features, for sure.
If you don't really keep up with the Kardashians, Khloe Kardashian is known for editing her pics a ton. So when you compare Serena to her, she's like Khloe without the Photoshop (check out the pic on the right below).

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


   
Reply
0

#2
Checked her website just now. Her "naughty GFE" is CBJ for 1200 for 1hr. Her pics and vids do look hot though
Reply
0

#3
I saw Serena once. 

I gotta keep it real, even though I think she was feeling me, I gotta agree with what folks are saying, she don’t look at all as good as her pics. 

As my n Kanye said "I should hire this bitch she so damn good at photoshop"

Even her videos are just good angles covering her bad parts.

She is built like spongebob with bolt ons

If you wanna see a girl who pretty much looks the same both body and face-wise but got some ink, check out Miami at Asian Fever. They could be sisters and Miamis like 1/3rd or 1/4th the rate.

Hope im not overstepping on this review. It feels too good to be honest and not have to censor myself.
Reply
0

#4
I remember when the post "Serena Sinclair and I did not have sex" was first shared on Perb, and the comment section was really upsetting. Many members (the same typical woke ones), including one of the mods, suggested that the original poster should have taken advantage of Serena. It’s a gross example of how the Perb mods and their lapdogs act.
Reply
0

#5
Serenas mid
both in service and looks

Chloe Kardashian comparison is accurate ? XD
Reply
0

#6
Serena is a bad apple
Reply
0

#7
(04-05-2025, 06:46 PM)Blob Wrote: Serena is a bad apple
This is the first time I've heard this male feminist/biggest white knight on this site express anything that isn't extremely positive about a provider.

What is the story Blob?
Reply
0

#8
(04-06-2025, 03:35 PM)yaletownfuckboi Wrote:
(04-05-2025, 06:46 PM)Blob Wrote: Serena is a bad apple
This is the first time I've heard this male feminist/biggest white knight on this site express anything that isn't extremely positive about a provider.

What is the story Blob?

This is the 1st time I've seen you question another member over a review that only consists of a few words. 

I am still questioning if Marcus has ever seen an SP
Reply
0

#9
(04-06-2025, 03:42 PM)thatsoraven Wrote:
(04-06-2025, 03:35 PM)yaletownfuckboi Wrote: This is the first time I've heard this male feminist/biggest white knight on this site express anything that isn't extremely positive about a provider.

What is the story Blob?

This is the 1st time I've seen you question another member over a review that only consists of a few words. 

I am still questioning if Marcus has ever seen an SP
because Blob consistently states that we should be/aren't allowed to be making negative comments about women/providers.

Im not Marcus, I dont know what he has to do with anything
Reply
0

#10
(04-06-2025, 03:42 PM)thatsoraven Wrote:
(04-06-2025, 03:35 PM)yaletownfuckboi Wrote: This is the first time I've heard this male feminist/biggest white knight on this site express anything that isn't extremely positive about a provider.

What is the story Blob?

This is the 1st time I've seen you question another member over a review that only consists of a few words. 

I am still questioning if Marcus has ever seen an SP

I have seen many eskis
TONS just slide into my DMs and let me hit it for free cause im a big deal on IG clouted and breaded.
I pay when im tired *yawn*
I pay em to leave
Reply
0

#11
I liked talking to serena, she is friendly , maybe a bit of a watching paint dry personality but thats not of concern.
I do agree her shape in person isnt as good as her shape on twitter and her website. face is medium .
not worth the $1000 bag imho, and that seems to be the consensus im seeing here as well.
Reply
0

#12
I might not be in a position to say much since I've never actually met her, and this could just be hearsay. Still, based on what I’ve heard from other girls, she seems to have psychopathic tendencies, which could explain the reviews.

edited adastra - OF_Manager see SP private forum for explanation.
Onlyfans Manager, Male Pornstar, Former Male Escort & Stripper. 
Reply
0

#13
(04-08-2025, 01:04 PM)OF_Manager Wrote: I might not be in a position to say much since I've never actually met her, and this could just be hearsay. Still, based on what I’ve heard from other girls, she seems to have psychopathic tendencies, which could explain the reviews.

Anyway, setting aside the gossip, she was face-out at one point while working in New Zealand/Australia. There used to be more pictures of her face available. if you did some googling, including the one below with no blurring. However, I believe she attempted to have most of them removed after they were briefly posted on Perb. Maybe someone else will be able to track some down. I'm sure they can be found with the right keywords in an appropriate search engine or on twitter.

It's wrong to search for unblurred face photos someone has tried to remove because it violates their privacy and disrespects their right to withdraw consent. Even if the images were once public, continuing to seek them out disregards the individual’s current boundaries and potentially exposes them to harm, especially in sensitive industries like sex work. It also undermines the trust and safety within communities that rely on mutual respect. Ethically, it's important to honor what someone chooses to share and not pursue content they've intentionally taken down, thank you
Reply
0

#14
(04-08-2025, 01:59 PM)thatsoraven Wrote: It's wrong to search for unblurred face photos someone has tried to remove because it violates their privacy and disrespects their right to withdraw consent. Even if the images were once public, continuing to seek them out disregards the individual’s current boundaries and potentially exposes them to harm, especially in sensitive industries like sex work. It also undermines the trust and safety within communities that rely on mutual respect. Ethically, it's important to honor what someone chooses to share and not pursue content they've intentionally taken down, thank you
You can discuss the ethics endlessly, but those pictures are public, knowing that nothing really disappears from the internet. She has the means to hire a company to remove it, yet she hasn’t. This indicates that, although she might not like those pictures being out there, she could have chosen to have it deleted from search engines if it really concerned her. Anyone could have found them.

This isn't a matter of privacy, nor is it a question of consent. If you're going in that direction, don't you think about the consent of the many men who regret spending over $1000 to book with her? I'm sure some of them would choose to withdraw their consent if they could.
Onlyfans Manager, Male Pornstar, Former Male Escort & Stripper. 
Reply
0

#15
(04-08-2025, 02:44 PM)OF_Manager Wrote:
(04-08-2025, 01:59 PM)thatsoraven Wrote: It's wrong to search for unblurred face photos someone has tried to remove because it violates their privacy and disrespects their right to withdraw consent. Even if the images were once public, continuing to seek them out disregards the individual’s current boundaries and potentially exposes them to harm, especially in sensitive industries like sex work. It also undermines the trust and safety within communities that rely on mutual respect. Ethically, it's important to honor what someone chooses to share and not pursue content they've intentionally taken down, thank you
You can discuss the ethics endlessly, but those pictures are public, knowing that nothing really disappears from the internet. She has the means to hire a company to remove it, yet she hasn’t. This indicates that, although she might not like those pictures being out there, she could have chosen to have it deleted from search engines if it really concerned her. Anyone could have found them.

This isn't a matter of privacy, nor is it a question of consent. If you're going in that direction, don't you think about the consent of the many men who regret spending over $1000 to book with her? I'm sure some of them would choose to withdraw their consent if they could.

Just because something is publicly accessible doesn’t mean it’s ethical to spread, repost, or discuss without context or consent. Revenge porn laws, for example, exist because even “public” materials can be weaponized. The intention behind sharing matters. Using old, possibly out-of-context photos to shame or discredit someone—especially a woman in sex work—reinforces stigma and power imbalances.

The assumption that someone with the means to remove content should have done so unfairly shifts the burden onto the individual to fix something they may not even be able to fully erase. Google removal, DMCA takedowns, or reputation management services are not foolproof. And even if she tried, caches, screenshots, and data leaks can keep content floating indefinitely. It's victim-blaming to suggest that someone must not care just because the problem persists.

If someone books a service and regrets it after, that’s unfortunate—but it doesn’t invalidate the original transaction or consent. It’s the same as going to a restaurant, not enjoying the meal, and wanting a refund. You’re allowed to feel disappointed, but you don’t get to say you were misled unless there was false advertising or coercion. Equating this with a lack of consent dilutes the seriousness of what consent truly

P.s 

DMCA can't remove everything. Because shitty exploitative websites keep sharing it. So, no, it's not that straight forward when it comes to removing images
Reply
0

#16
(04-08-2025, 02:54 PM)thatsoraven Wrote:
(04-08-2025, 02:44 PM)OF_Manager Wrote: You can discuss the ethics endlessly, but those pictures are public, knowing that nothing really disappears from the internet. She has the means to hire a company to remove it, yet she hasn’t. This indicates that, although she might not like those pictures being out there, she could have chosen to have it deleted from search engines if it really concerned her. Anyone could have found them.
This isn't a matter of privacy, nor is it a question of consent. If you're going in that direction, don't you think about the consent of the many men who regret spending over $1000 to book with her? I'm sure some of them would choose to withdraw their consent if they could.

Just because something is publicly accessible doesn’t mean it’s ethical to spread, repost, or discuss without context or consent. Revenge porn laws, for example, exist because even “public” materials can be weaponized. The intention behind sharing matters. Using old, possibly out-of-context photos to shame or discredit someone—especially a woman in sex work—reinforces stigma and power imbalances.
The assumption that someone with the means to remove content should have done so unfairly shifts the burden onto the individual to fix something they may not even be able to fully erase. Google removal, DMCA takedowns, or reputation management services are not foolproof. And even if she tried, caches, screenshots, and data leaks can keep content floating indefinitely. It's victim-blaming to suggest that someone must not care just because the problem persists.
If someone books a service and regrets it after, that’s unfortunate—but it doesn’t invalidate the original transaction or consent. It’s the same as going to a restaurant, not enjoying the meal, and wanting a refund. You’re allowed to feel disappointed, but you don’t get to say you were misled unless there was false advertising or coercion. Equating this with a lack of consent dilutes the seriousness of what consent truly
P.s 
DMCA can't remove everything. Because shitty exploitative websites keep sharing it. So, no, it's not that straight forward when it comes to removing images
Im an onlyfans manager. Ive helped girls remove their stuff from the internet when they retire or when it leaks, its not perfect, but it works, its just expensive.
I deal with this stuff alot. 

"You’re allowed to feel disappointed, but you don’t get to say you were misled unless there was false advertising or coercion"
This whole thread is guys complaining she doesn't look like her photos

"Equating this with a lack of consent dilutes the seriousness of what consent truly"
So does stating that someone's photos that can be found through a google search constitute a violation of consent
Onlyfans Manager, Male Pornstar, Former Male Escort & Stripper. 
Reply
0

#17
ya'll chill ?
She dont even look like that anymore.
Thats like a nosejob ago and minus 5 pounds of face filler.
Shes in her 30s now, that pictures gotta be a decade ago.
Reply
0

#18
(04-08-2025, 03:02 PM)OF_Manager Wrote:
(04-08-2025, 02:54 PM)thatsoraven Wrote: Just because something is publicly accessible doesn’t mean it’s ethical to spread, repost, or discuss without context or consent. Revenge porn laws, for example, exist because even “public” materials can be weaponized. The intention behind sharing matters. Using old, possibly out-of-context photos to shame or discredit someone—especially a woman in sex work—reinforces stigma and power imbalances.
The assumption that someone with the means to remove content should have done so unfairly shifts the burden onto the individual to fix something they may not even be able to fully erase. Google removal, DMCA takedowns, or reputation management services are not foolproof. And even if she tried, caches, screenshots, and data leaks can keep content floating indefinitely. It's victim-blaming to suggest that someone must not care just because the problem persists.
If someone books a service and regrets it after, that’s unfortunate—but it doesn’t invalidate the original transaction or consent. It’s the same as going to a restaurant, not enjoying the meal, and wanting a refund. You’re allowed to feel disappointed, but you don’t get to say you were misled unless there was false advertising or coercion. Equating this with a lack of consent dilutes the seriousness of what consent truly
P.s 
DMCA can't remove everything. Because shitty exploitative websites keep sharing it. So, no, it's not that straight forward when it comes to removing images
Im an onlyfans manager. Ive helped girls remove their stuff from the internet when they retire or when it leaks, its not perfect, but it works, its just expensive.
I deal with this stuff alot. 

"You’re allowed to feel disappointed, but you don’t get to say you were misled unless there was false advertising or coercion"
This whole thread is guys complaining she doesn't look like her photos

"Equating this with a lack of consent dilutes the seriousness of what consent truly"
So does stating that someone's photos that can be found through a google search constitute a violation of consent

You're missing the point entirely. Just because you can find the images, doesn't mean you should justify spreading them around, especially when you know that's not what the provider wants. 

I've dealt with these sites before. Some of them are just straight up scams, and will take your money but then give your images to another website so that you'll have to pay for the same service again... repeat this a few times, and they've managed to scam a lot of money out of you. Further spreading her images around will only add to the problem, please consider that.


I was curious, so I went over to her website to check out her gallery.  She has videos of herself posted. These clearly show her body. I am not sure how she's tricking anyone.
Reply
0

#19
(04-08-2025, 03:45 PM)thatsoraven Wrote: You're missing the point entirely. Just because you can find the images, doesn't mean you should justify spreading them around, especially when you know that's not what the provider wants. 

I've dealt with these sites before. Some of them are just straight up scams, and will take your money but then give your images to another website so that you'll have to pay for the same service again... repeat this a few times, and they've managed to scam a lot of money out of you. Further spreading her images around will only add to the problem, please consider that.
Sure. And please consider that men want to gather as much information as possible about a provider and what she looks like before spending $1,000 of their hard-earned money on her.
Onlyfans Manager, Male Pornstar, Former Male Escort & Stripper. 
Reply
0



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
3 Guest(s)