Serena Sinclair - A collection of negative reviews

[OF_Manager]

You can discuss the ethics endlessly, but those pictures are public, knowing that nothing really disappears from the internet. She has the means to hire a company to remove it, yet she hasn’t. This indicates that, although she might not like those pictures being out there, she could have chosen to have it deleted from search engines if it really concerned her. Anyone could have found them.
This isn't a matter of privacy, nor is it a question of consent. If you're going in that direction, don't you think about the consent of the many men who regret spending over $1000 to book with her? I'm sure some of them would choose to withdraw their consent if they could.

Just because something is publicly accessible doesn’t mean it’s ethical to spread, repost, or discuss without context or consent. Revenge porn laws, for example, exist because even “public” materials can be weaponized. The intention behind sharing matters. Using old, possibly out-of-context photos to shame or discredit someone—especially a woman in sex work—reinforces stigma and power imbalances.
The assumption that someone with the means to remove content should have done so unfairly shifts the burden onto the individual to fix something they may not even be able to fully erase. Google removal, DMCA takedowns, or reputation management services are not foolproof. And even if she tried, caches, screenshots, and data leaks can keep content floating indefinitely. It's victim-blaming to suggest that someone must not care just because the problem persists.
If someone books a service and regrets it after, that’s unfortunate—but it doesn’t invalidate the original transaction or consent. It’s the same as going to a restaurant, not enjoying the meal, and wanting a refund. You’re allowed to feel disappointed, but you don’t get to say you were misled unless there was false advertising or coercion. Equating this with a lack of consent dilutes the seriousness of what consent truly
P.s 
DMCA can't remove everything. Because shitty exploitative websites keep sharing it. So, no, it's not that straight forward when it comes to removing images

Im an onlyfans manager. Ive helped girls remove their stuff from the internet when they retire or when it leaks, its not perfect, but it works, its just expensive.
I deal with this stuff alot. 

"You’re allowed to feel disappointed, but you don’t get to say you were misled unless there was false advertising or coercion"
This whole thread is guys complaining she doesn't look like her photos

"Equating this with a lack of consent dilutes the seriousness of what consent truly"
So does stating that someone's photos that can be found through a google search constitute a violation of consent