Cameras Located Within Agency and Provider Incall Spaces

[Lawman]

Agreed

Would the one party consent be applied to the SP filming clients? If they are involved in the being filmed part. Either way I’m going to monitor this thread as I did not realize how prevalent this issue is.

---

Can we get more specific as well meaning start putting not just the agency but the actual incall location these cameras have been spotted.

No, single-party consent does not pertain to this matter for several reasons. First, the activity is occurring within a private residence, the single-party consent doctrine generally applies only in public settings or commercial environments such as business offices or storefronts. Additionally, even assuming that the individuals involved possess the requisite licenses to perform their services, it is highly unlikely that the building owners, strata corporations, or property management have granted authorization for an escort agency to operate within those premises, therefore it wouldn't qualify as a commercial environment. Furthermore, even if the building or strata corporation were to permit such activity, it would still, in the eyes of the law, and should this matter proceed to court or result in charges, be regarded as a private residence. Legal precedents affirm this interpretation.

Nonetheless, the above is ultimately irrelevant, as the moment sexual acts or nudity occur, the activity becomes unequivocally illegal. Such conduct would likely constitute sexual assault under applicable laws and may also fall within the scope of revenge pornography statutes, likely both offences simultaneously. Canada maintains some of the strictest legislation worldwide regarding these matters, and there exists considerable legal precedent and numerous case law examples addressing similar situations.

Thats why we must treat these woman as what they are: sexual predators.