5 hours ago
(6 hours ago)adastr@ Wrote:What exactly do you expect us to do? Do you want us to visit these incalls and take pictures or videos of the cameras so we can verify it for you? Essentially, are you asking us to dox ourselves just to prove it?(Yesterday, 07:21 PM)Silverfox Wrote: Personally, I would appreciate hearing an explanation from Nicole Vixen, as I noticed she now has an account here. The times I saw her, I don't recall ever noticing a camera, but I suppose that might be a sign of how captivated I was by her looks.
If she mentioned that she now understands things from the clients' perspective and stated she would no longer use a camera, I’d be open to seeing her again. However, if she continues using it, unfortunately, I would have to decline.
Regarding the other providers and agencies mentioned, I have no interest in seeing any of them. None of them are that good looking anyways.
Has it been confirmed that Nicole Vixon records inside her incall?
This thread is problematic if we are posting false allegations from 3rd parties we cant verify.
You guys are ruining this thread by posting unverified accusations.
The only one that appears to be in dispute is PDC. I’ve never been there, so I don’t have any firsthand knowledge.
Regarding the Coco Collective allegations, I believe they stem from a situation years ago when one of their providers recorded men entering their incall on her laptop and posted the videos on TikTok. In that case, it was an isolated incident involving a rogue provider. That is essentially about as verified as you can get.
However, I haven't come across any Ring cameras at any of the Coco Collective incalls. So as far as what we are talking about in this thread, I think Coco Collective is clean.
The remaining allegations appear to be fairly verified. I’ve seen a few myself, and other accusations have been made by multiple credible members.
Additionally, none of the providers or agencies mentioned have come forward here to deny having cameras inside their incalls. That says a lot, t’s practically an admission of guilt.
And if you think about it logically, what would any of us gain from lying about there being cameras inside the incalls? How would that benefit anyone?
I'm actually surprised that so many providers have an issue with this site, because your moderation style consistently places the burden of proof on men, never on women. A woman's testimony is given more weight than the testimony of ten men in your moderation approach.