Cameras Located Within Agency and Provider Incall Spaces

[Wario]

But full stop on saying anything derogatory about him
It’s hard to have real friends in this biz & he has been an amazing platonic buddy to me for a very long time. Abd an extremely bright guy trust me I know
Thou shalt not insult Miss Hs friends . #1 rule

---

At one point I thought he would fit in here cuz he’s successful, wealthy unfiltered and appreciates real legit reviews
But you guys have gone so far off the rails even he isn’t impressed and he was once considered to be one of the most obnoxious assholes on perb
If even he is hesitant about coming here now that’s a huge red flag
Anyone here who has been on perb a long time should have an idea of who I’m talking about

What kind of lawyer hides behind an escort to shield him from perfectly valid criticism? This is quite strange, to say the least.

---

Skyline, AF, and many of the agencies and providers mentioned here are filming people having sex or naked

Apparently Hunter does it, too. Although the thread regarding her specifically is "redacted for legal reasons."

Hunter is employed by Skyline and uses their spaces, Skyline one of the agencies that has cameras positioned in the same room where the sex is taking place, which is illegal.
Skyline's studio apartments are also quite small, with the bathroom situated right next to the front door. Although they claim their cameras are aimed at the front entrance, they could still capture a naked person leaving the bathroom, especially if he is unaware of the cameras or forgets about their presence in the heat of the moment.

You don't even need to have been to Skyline to know this, you can find the blueprints of their studio apartment layouts online. Once you review them, it becomes clear that if a guy takes just one wrong step, he's being filmed naked.

Regardless, since it's a studio apartment, the fact that the cameras are in the same room where sex is happening is illegal in multiple ways, especially considering that they also record sound.

Her entire argument about a "reasonable expectation of privacy" falls apart because the agencies are required to obtain the client's consent for the cameras. Since none of these agencies advertise that they have cameras, they are definitely not asking for or obtaining that consent.

So yes, Ms Hunter is guilty in this as well. 
If I were Ms. Hunter, I would be upset with my employer, Skyline, for not defending her, and for putting her at risk of legal issues.