09-09-2025, 10:02 AM
(09-09-2025, 05:41 AM)Wario Wrote:Yes, I agree with this. I saw Anastasia years ago, and at that time, her photos were quite accurate. She provided excellent service and had a great attitude, some of the best.(09-08-2025, 04:27 PM)TapThat Wrote: Have seen her photos on X/Twitter and their still stunning. I'm talking about the overall person not just her appearance, she truly is a great host and provider of services.
I know but the complaints in this thread is that her photos are not accurate and out dated.
And she said she would update them but hasnt, which doesnt sound like a good person.
Would you agree that she should update her photos so that she isnt misleading potential clients?
Looks are important when paying an escort for sex. Just as important as service sometimes.
But based on her current photos on X and elsewhere, I’d say she looks quite different from when I saw her years ago, and she doesn’t really resemble the pictures in her Tryst ad at all anymore. Which is why I haven't booked again.
If someone were to book her based on the photos in her Tryst ad, they might end up disappointed, as the images are not accurate to her present looks. If a person is expecting a slim woman in her early to mid 20s but is instead met with someone in her early 30s with an average build, there could be a mismatch in expectations.
Of course, good service and a great attitude are important, and if she’s still delivering on that, that’s definitely a good thing. But when it comes to seeing escorts, looks do play a big role, we’re not trying to date these women, so physical appearance is a key part of the experience