Posts: 158
Threads: 1
Joined: Jan 2025
04-07-2025, 06:14 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-07-2025, 06:15 AM by yaletownfuckboi.)
Personally disagree.
Sometimes someone says something dumb, and you want to point it out without disrupting the thread or adding unnecessary clutter by commenting on how dumb their remark was in the thread.
I can envision a future where it might need to be eliminated if it becomes overly abused, but for now, I haven’t really noticed much tit-for-tat or significant misuse.
Posts: 438
Threads: 40
Joined: Jun 2024
(04-07-2025, 06:14 AM)yaletownfuckboi Wrote: Personally disagree.
Sometimes someone says something dumb, and you want to point it out without disrupting the thread or adding unnecessary clutter by commenting on how dumb their remark was in the thread.
I can envision a future where it might need to be eliminated if it becomes overly abused, but for now, I haven’t really noticed much tit-for-tat or significant misuse.
There has been a few users who sign who sign up only to leave bad ratings. I deleted those ratings, but didn't ban those users.
I was under the impression that everyone didn't like it. Or it seems like people only use it for negative, not really much for positive.
But users
like or
hate a lot. So we can add up
likes and
hates and rate users based on that instead, I thought maybe it would be more fair that way.
Posts: 74
Threads: 6
Joined: Feb 2025
I believe we should reinstate this, at least for users who are trustworthy. It seemed to help keep bad faith actors in check to some extent.
Posts: 438
Threads: 40
Joined: Jun 2024
I will enable again, first I am trying to get emoticons to work.