Maggie formerly from pdc

[LuciferJones]

I know we arent supposed to speak of this particular agency or accommodations host. However, we have a former provider who left pdc who recently advertised with someone who has been warned about in PERB, named Victoria (in Surrey 5882).  As much as i can't say i know for certain what is truly going on at the agency of whose name must be redacted, we should take things with a grain of salt if girls share certain details from their former employment experience there. This is not to say that they may be lying, but look at Maggie, shes reputable and had golden reviews on perb, and then shes offering duos with a crackhead who has been known to rob clients at gunpoint with her boyfriend and other duo partner. If Maggie were to ever join here to tell us anything about her time with pdc i wouldn't accept her as a reliable witness. 

This should be a cautionary tale on trusting anyone who mutually dislikes someone we do.

One thing with this forum is that it is at its infancy, with not much gate keeping. We dont know yet who the legit pooners are, and which ones are service provides masquerading as pooners, riding things out, hoping to get a seat at the table as a potential admin or mod so that they can influence pooners to see them and their circle/clique. 

I can see this taking years to figure out and follow the posting pattern/history of said members before figuring out who is a legit pooner vs someone with ulterior motives. Nothing stops a perb mod from being in this group and trying to rid of members on perb they suspect are on here.

Just as well, they could easily be hoping for a seat at the table as an admin/mod in order to infiltrate and to undermine the goals of this forum. 

I think what allows perb to operate as it does is that it was started at a time before providers could clue in that there was forum where they were talked about. Im sure it took years before they stated to have a presence there themselves. With a new forum like this it runs the risk of being easier to infiltrate because there is no way to know who is who when they join and contribute.

[Peyto]

In regards to Victoria - 5882. are you saying she is not worth a session visit?

[Jediknight]

As someone who sees Maggie she only posted for a few duos before shes moving out of BC because Jenna didnt have room for her. But she told me her and Jenna are good friends. I'm assuming she needed more money for her out of province move.

Good luck Maggie I'll miss you!

[Peyto]

Is there a link for Maggie?

[Jediknight]

Is there a link for Maggie?

No because she was only available for 2 days. She said what happened was she was short and just needed to make some extra money. Jenna just didn't have any room since it was a sporadic few days. From what I know she's already left from the province. But you could message Jenna she would probably have more information

[Marko]

I know we arent supposed to speak of this particular agency or accommodations host. However, we have a former provider who left pdc who recently advertised with someone who has been warned about in PERB, named Victoria (in Surrey 5882).  As much as i can't say i know for certain what is truly going on at the agency of whose name must be redacted, we should take things with a grain of salt if girls share certain details from their former employment experience there. This is not to say that they may be lying, but look at Maggie, shes reputable and had golden reviews on perb, and then shes offering duos with a crackhead who has been known to rob clients at gunpoint with her boyfriend and other duo partner. If Maggie were to ever join here to tell us anything about her time with pdc i wouldn't accept her as a reliable witness. 

This should be a cautionary tale on trusting anyone who mutually dislikes someone we do.

One thing with this forum is that it is at its infancy, with not much gate keeping. We dont know yet who the legit pooners are, and which ones are service provides masquerading as pooners, riding things out, hoping to get a seat at the table as a potential admin or mod so that they can influence pooners to see them and their circle/clique. 

I can see this taking years to figure out and follow the posting pattern/history of said members before figuring out who is a legit pooner vs someone with ulterior motives. Nothing stops a perb mod from being in this group and trying to rid of members on perb they suspect are on here.

Just as well, they could easily be hoping for a seat at the table as an admin/mod in order to infiltrate and to undermine the goals of this forum. 

I think what allows perb to operate as it does is that it was started at a time before providers could clue in that there was forum where they were talked about. Im sure it took years before they stated to have a presence there themselves. With a new forum like this it runs the risk of being easier to infiltrate because there is no way to know who is who when they join and contribute.

Any client is free to talk about or review Pink Diamound Collective escort agency. On Perb, PDC is a paid provider, so you will never find a critical review since the Perb mods are cucks and do whatever thier masters tell them. Miss Hunter, who is part of PDC is an exception, cause I like her, she is allowed to post on Menz as long as its not on a review thread. But Jenna, who runs the collective, is not allowed and not welcome here, and isn't trustworthy. Victoria or whoever else is not allow to post here, unless its to respond to her own review. But Maggie is allow to respond to this thread , since you made accusations against her. But nobody else can, especially Jenna.

I think you are overthinking this LuciferJones. If a new users signs up, then post 1 review that is 10/10, that is obviously a fake. Users labeled 'gentlemen' or 'maverick' are users who have been here a long time, or been at Perb a long time, so thier reviews hold more weight. Menz is smaller, less users and is therefore much easier to manage. Most of the high ranked clients here were already well known members on Perb for years. All you need to do is post here and contribute some reviews and you will be upgraded to a trustworthy member. 

Since we banned SPs a few months ago, there has been absolutely zero drama. Gone. Vanished. When we did allow SPs it was nothing but drama everyday. It was a huge headache. I use to hate to check the inbox. It's so much better now that it's men only.

And I think you are wrong that Perb was initially just clients reading it. Search engines have always existed and SPs read these forums more than clients do. Every SP searches her own name. And that term 'poon' you use, that was invented by Perb users, it does not exist anywhere else in the world.

[LuciferJones]

In regards to Victoria - 5882. are you saying she is not worth a session visit?

Perb is a compromised environment due to the sliminess of the perb mods and their willingness to undermine the integrity of what their forum once stood for. They are likely in bed with the providers who are allowed on the forum, likely exchanging sexual services to have bad reviews removed. However, you still get valuable Intel there, especially if you do your own additional detective work. Ill trust a bad review by someone who's been there for a solid decade, and whose reviews on other SPs have matched my experience. Having said that, Victoria 5882 has been noted of assaulting clients and her duo partner and boyfriend robbed a guy. Jessica Kane vibes, early stages. 

Maggie went from being a reputable provider from a semi questionable agency, to a zero in a heart beat for aligning herself with such a person. Ironically there was perb post about this, which im sure the mods removed and even Jenna chimed in stating she had no words.

---

As someone who sees Maggie she only posted for a few duos before shes moving out of BC because Jenna didnt have room for her. But she told me her and Jenna are good friends. I'm assuming she needed more money for her out of province move.

Good luck Maggie I'll miss you!

Bro, she went from being reputable to an absolute zero by doing that. Sorry you dont go working with Jessica Kane, in the making.

[Jediknight]

[quote pid="6286" dateline="1755752943"]

---

As someone who sees Maggie she only posted for a few duos before shes moving out of BC because Jenna didnt have room for her. But she told me her and Jenna are good friends. I'm assuming she needed more money for her out of province move.

Good luck Maggie I'll miss you!

Bro, she went from being reputable to an absolute zero by doing that. Sorry you dont go working with Jessica Kane, in the making.
[/quote]

I’m not disagreeing, and as someone who has spoken with Jenna about this, she’s been very clear. She needed space for a few days, and since Jenna didn’t have the room, it sounds like Maggie went where she could. I wouldn’t say this came from a semi-reputable collective—Jenna is reputable and has consistently proven that both in and out of the industry.

I do feel bad for Maggie, as I’ve seen her many times over the years. From what I gather, she needed to make money, and it’s hard to say whether she was aware of this person’s reputation. Jenna also stated in a text that she wants no ties to anyone with a reputation like Victorias in any capacity, as she stands firmly against that in the industry. That’s why she came forward with a statement—to ensure there were absolutely no connections.

It’s an unfortunate situation overall

[LuciferJones]

[quote pid="6286" dateline="1755752943"]

---

As someone who sees Maggie she only posted for a few duos before shes moving out of BC because Jenna didnt have room for her. But she told me her and Jenna are good friends. I'm assuming she needed more money for her out of province move.

Good luck Maggie I'll miss you!

Bro, she went from being reputable to an absolute zero by doing that. Sorry you dont go working with Jessica Kane, in the making.

I’m not disagreeing, and as someone who has spoken with Jenna about this, she’s been very clear. She needed space for a few days, and since Jenna didn’t have the room, it sounds like Maggie went where she could. I wouldn’t say this came from a semi-reputable collective—Jenna is reputable and has consistently proven that both in and out of the industry.

I do feel bad for Maggie, as I’ve seen her many times over the years. From what I gather, she needed to make money, and it’s hard to say whether she was aware of this person’s reputation. Jenna also stated in a text that she wants no ties to anyone with a reputation like Victorias in any capacity, as she stands firmly against that in the industry. That’s why she came forward with a statement—to ensure there were absolutely no connections.

It’s an unfortunate situation overall
[/quote]


We are all going through hard shit. Money is not easy to come by. This post isn't about Jenna or PDC, its about a former PDC girl, who just threw her reputation out the window. Mind you if she ever comes here to knock on pdc id know not to take her word for it. I used Maggie as an example of why we take things with a grain of salt of former workers from any agency.

[adastr@]

This thread is now locked. We don't want PDC drama here.