Yesterday, 11:22 AM
(This post was last modified: Yesterday, 11:23 AM by razzar1234.)
"complaining" about rates?
|
Yesterday, 12:20 PM
(04-12-2025, 05:41 PM)Mikey Wrote:That reasoning presumes that these girls with high rates are receiving regular bookings and returning clients. I would guess that most of them are only getting a couple clients each month, and many aren't seeing repeat business because they attract customers with edited photos etc, essentially deceiving them.(04-12-2025, 02:32 PM)razzar1234 Wrote: A lot of SP's seem to think that just because we're wealthy, we should just roll over, and give up any amount of money without question. Many of these girls appear to be "10s" in their photos, but in person, they are only be a "5." This industry doesn't typically bring in exceptionally attractive women. If the girls charging $1,000 an hour were seeing a high volume of clients, they would be living extravagantly, and they arent. Instead, I would assume this isn't their primary source of income. I would guess that those charging lower rates are actually earning more.
Yesterday, 03:15 PM
(Yesterday, 12:20 PM)yaletownfuckboi Wrote:Its funny you mentioned this because I just saw a provider share on her personal instagram story that she's doing taxes for her other non escort job, despite being a $1,000 an hour escort. Clearly she isn't getting many clients.(04-12-2025, 05:41 PM)Mikey Wrote: It's so funny reading some of the comments here, especially this one above. Are you also in favour of rent controls? Supply management gets your vote too? Sex work is a free market: a 1 can charge whatever they want. Here's a little secret - you don't have to pay the rate if you don't want to. If no one is buying, then the swer will lower their rates or leave the business or rebrand. If you see the price staying at a 10 for someone you think is a 5, then probably they float someone's boat and are making enough not to have to lower their rates. This isn't rocket science lolThat reasoning presumes that these girls with high rates are receiving regular bookings and returning clients. I would guess that most of them are only getting a couple clients each month, and many aren't seeing repeat business because they attract customers with edited photos etc, essentially deceiving them.
Yesterday, 03:35 PM
(Yesterday, 03:15 PM)Wario Wrote:(Yesterday, 12:20 PM)yaletownfuckboi Wrote: That reasoning presumes that these girls with high rates are receiving regular bookings and returning clients. I would guess that most of them are only getting a couple clients each month, and many aren't seeing repeat business because they attract customers with edited photos etc, essentially deceiving them.Its funny you mentioned this because I just saw a provider share on her personal instagram story that she's doing taxes for her other non escort job, despite being a $1,000 an hour escort. Clearly she isn't getting many clients. Emma Sinclair ?
9 hours ago
don't complain
just pay or do not. that's it. the market will self regulate, hopefully
¡Hasta el Machismo Siempre!
9 hours ago
(Yesterday, 03:35 PM)yaletownfuckboi Wrote:(Yesterday, 03:15 PM)Wario Wrote: Its funny you mentioned this because I just saw a provider share on her personal instagram story that she's doing taxes for her other non escort job, despite being a $1,000 an hour escort. Clearly she isn't getting many clients. Yes it was haha
9 hours ago
(Yesterday, 03:35 PM)yaletownfuckboi Wrote:(Yesterday, 03:15 PM)Wario Wrote: Its funny you mentioned this because I just saw a provider share on her personal instagram story that she's doing taxes for her other non escort job, despite being a $1,000 an hour escort. Clearly she isn't getting many clients. Or maybe she loves her non escort job, and isn't trying to have more than 5 clients per month. Hmmm. Many have a quality over quantity approach.
8 hours ago
(9 hours ago)Wario Wrote:She serves as a prime example of a provider whose extremely edited photos don't reflect her true appearance. In her ad, she looks like an 8, but in real life, she is as a 5 or 6, all while charging rates that a 10 would demand. Id also be quite shocked if she was her listed age of 27, she looks early to mid 30s.(Yesterday, 03:35 PM)yaletownfuckboi Wrote: Emma Sinclair ?
6 hours ago
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |